For a few minutes, I thought we had found the new name of the War On Terror. Now the Administration are denying that they've changed it to "Other Contingency Operations." Personally, I think they floated the balloon through a civil servant, and now realize it's an utterly ridiculous name and description.
It was reported by This Ain't Hell, quoting The Washington Post, which says:
"In a memo e-mailed this week to Pentagon staff members, the Defense Department's office of security review noted that "this administration prefers to avoid using the term 'Long War' or 'Global War on Terror' [GWOT.] Please use 'Overseas Contingency Operation.' "
Uncle Jimbo of Blackfive was less politically correct in calling this what it is: ignorant naivete.
This sounds a bit like calling the Korean War a "Police Action," but with less clarity. When Troops are being shot at by the enemy, it is War.
I wonder, since the new Administration has decided it will no longer be called The Global War on Terrorism, even if they are denying they've chosen the name "Overseas Contingency Operation" will they stop issuing the Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal (GWOTEM) and Global War On Terrorism Service Medal (GWOTSM). Will they develop a new medal, the OCOEM and OCOSM? Perhaps the ORGASM (Overseas Relatively Global Activation of Service Medal)?
Who wouldn't want to put on their Class A's, if it included the ORGASM?
And do Our Troops get another service star on the National Defense Service Medal, if this is no longer the GWOT, but the OCO or ORGA?
Perhaps it's past time for the new Administration to assemble a new Expert Panel to examine the issue? It's pretty clear that we need to call this thing something. I don't think he'll put us on the Panel. I'd recommend a clear cut name like the Global War on Terrorism. This would be a clear break from the previous administration by adding the "ism."
Perhaps we should call it the "International War On Terrorism." Or the "International War Against Islamism." Perhaps World War III?
Or perhaps we should call it the "Battle Diplomatic Advance of Political Correctness Against Clarity" (DAPCAC) or "Diplomatic Interests of Politics Supporting High Interest Targets" (DIPSHIT).
Frankly, whatever the new Administration wants to call it does not change what needs to be done. That is actively pursue the organizations and terrorists that wish to harm Our Citizens while supporting our Allies that help us, diplomatically, and giving no quarter to the enemy.
War on Terror News©2009, ARM, all rights reserved.
We Invite readers to weigh in with their best names for the GWOT
Recent Comments