It takes little effort to see that there are numerous organizations with good causes as their defined mission statement. One can look through this category, Support Our Troops - Actively, to find that many of these organizations mirror others.
There are also a multitude of websites and blogs that address the same subjects and the same issues. There exist websites that are very similar to this one. They often have a different set of readers than this one but I consider them colleagues not competitors. Some have even become part of our blogroll and vice versa. So long as the American People read and realize the Honor, Valor, and Generosity of Our Troops, it's ok if they read it in the NYTimes, on Chandler's Watch or here. (If the NYTimes were doing so, War On Terror News would never have come about.)
Whether we're discussing the thousands of Military Blogs, or the multitude of Non-Profits aimed at sending messages, mail, and packages to Troops, or the care for Wounded Warriors and their families or
even the divisiveness inside some of the Veterans' Service Organizations, it can be detrimental to the mission statements of those involved to create new organizations with mission statements supplanting others.
No doubt, many of these duplicate efforts were innocently created simultaneously because the parties simply didn't know about the others. Others were created because of a difference in opinion in the best means to tackle the issue. Perhaps some believed that there should be greater exclusion or inclusion of membership or focus.
There do exist some groups or organizations that I will refuse to endorse or perhaps even acknowledge, because either I cannot identify their true missions or suspect personal aggrandizement as of greater consequence than the mission they claim.
Others fall into a category of near subversive because they pretend to be something they are not. They actually actively work to undermine the very mission they portend to endorse. Some have put on such a great marketing success that even a hint of disagreement with them causes breaking from contact by their ardent supporters.
When multiple organizations are set up to do the same thing, one must choose between them but one must also question why they aren't joining forces to achieve the same end. If the goal is in accordance with the mission statement, there are few legitimate reasons to create a new organization. Generally the legitimate reason to do so is also the reason so many have already entered the space: personal aggrandizement or non-benevolence of those already in that space.
Sadly, one must also realize that Non-Profits are as often set up for personal profit and personal ego as not. One need only look at the very rich and their personal "non-profits" to see that something is awry. Many are nothing more than a tax shelter. Others are designed to achieve political goals. Some see a popular cause that they can use to attain greater personal wealth and/or power.
It's often difficult to ascertain which of the mirror organizations is the benevolent, which are simple duplications by chance of simultaneous origination, and which were started out of a less than altruisitic goal. And the benevolent of them cannot legitimately publically attack the less so without becoming the same as it opposes.
But it is time for a joining of forces rather than yet more upstarts to supplant the originals. This is one of the reasons for my endorsement of the Warrior Legacy Foundation, which reaches out to groups as varied as the Gathering of Eagles, and American Legion, to achieve the common goals of organizations that have common goals.
It is one of the reasons I respect Steve Russell, who has twice demonstrated his willingness to set aside the the aggrandizement of the organization he established, Vets For Victory, to support other organizations of the same mission, such as Warrior Legacy Foundation.
While I never served under his command, I can say with reasonable certainty that if I had, we would have at times disagreed but never to the detriment of his decisions nor my respect for him. I've spoken with LTC (ret) Russell more than once and always walked away knowing that he understood he was a part of something more important than himself. I've known in each conversation that he follows his convictions, not his personal missions. I've known that his words were true to those convictions.
It is time that milblogs, Pro-Troop Non-Profits, and others join together for the common missions they espouse. Together, we can become more effective. Apart we not only duplicate our efforts, but to some extent dilute them as well. This will take a degree of trust, a degree of humility, and a degree of selfless service and I don't have all the answers on how it is best achieved, but I recognize the need for consolidation of effort.
I recognize that it will take conversation and that there will be some disagreement on how best to proceed, but in the arena of this website and its mission statements, I encourage discussion with colleagues and "competitors." I encourage those of common values to join in as contributors and commentators here and as such to help shape the policies of the future here, as well as further the visibility of their own sites. I expect that we can arrive at a common agreement on many ideas that achieve the common goal.
And as importantly, if you're considering a new site, I'd encourage you to first consider banding together with an established site similar to your own goals, whether here or elsewhere. There is value in a unified effort.
War on Terror News©2009, ARM, all rights reserved.
Recent Comments